Bartlett & Bickley: Difference between revisions

From Pipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'London brand/trademark that ended around 1966. In a 1922 Dunhill vs Bartlett & Bickley curt case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed fr…')
 
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Need Information}}
London brand/trademark that ended around 1966.  
London brand/trademark that ended around 1966.  


In a 1922 Dunhill vs  Bartlett & Bickley curt case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed from this brand.
In a 1922 Dunhill vs  Bartlett & Bickley court case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed from this brand.
 
<gallery widths=300 heights=200 caption="Example of The 'Barbic' Pipe, made by Bartlett & Bickley, with original box and sock, courtesy Owen Brandeberry">
Bartlett-Bickly.jpg
Bartlett-Bickly-2.jpg
Bartlett-Bickly-3.jpg
Bartlett-Bickly-6.jpg
</gallery>
 
<gallery widths=400 heights=300 caption="Another example of a Bartlett & Bickley pipe, courtesy Owen Brandeberry">
Bartlett-Bickly-4.jpg
Bartlett-Bickly-5.jpg
</gallery>
 
[[Category:Pipe makers by nationality]]
[[Category:Great Britain]]

Latest revision as of 11:55, 26 December 2022

Need Information
If you have any information related to this, please add it here, or send it to mailto:sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add it for you.

London brand/trademark that ended around 1966.

In a 1922 Dunhill vs Bartlett & Bickley court case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed from this brand.