Bartlett & Bickley: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<gallery widths=300 heights=200 caption="Example of The 'Barbic' Pipe, made by Bartlett & Bickley, with original box and sock, courtesy Owen | <gallery widths=300 heights=200 caption="Example of The 'Barbic' Pipe, made by Bartlett & Bickley, with original box and sock, courtesy Owen Brandeberry"> | ||
Bartlett-Bickly.jpg | Bartlett-Bickly.jpg | ||
Bartlett-Bickly-2.jpg | Bartlett-Bickly-2.jpg | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 1 June 2021
London brand/trademark that ended around 1966.
In a 1922 Dunhill vs Bartlett & Bickley court case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed from this brand.
If you have additionaly details about this brand, please add them here or send them to sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add them for you.
- Example of The 'Barbic' Pipe, made by Bartlett & Bickley, with original box and sock, courtesy Owen Brandeberry
- Another example of a Bartlett & Bickley pipe, courtesy Owen Bradeberry
