Difference between revisions of "Bartlett & Bickley"

From Pipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
<gallery widths=400 heights=300 caption="Another example of a Bartlett & Bickley pipe, courtesy Owen Bradeberry">
+
<gallery widths=400 heights=300 caption="Another example of a Bartlett & Bickley pipe, courtesy Owen Brandeberry">
 
Bartlett-Bickly-4.jpg
 
Bartlett-Bickly-4.jpg
 
Bartlett-Bickly-5.jpg  
 
Bartlett-Bickly-5.jpg  

Latest revision as of 02:56, 1 June 2021

London brand/trademark that ended around 1966.

In a 1922 Dunhill vs Bartlett & Bickley court case (VOL 39 RPC 426), Dunhill lost a trademark fight to get the red dot removed from this brand.

If you have additionaly details about this brand, please add them here or send them to sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add them for you.