Mauro Cateni: Difference between revisions

From Pipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[http://www.pipephil.eu/logos/logo-m1.html#maurocateni Mauro Cateni???]'''. If you can shed any light on the origins of this pipe maker or brand, please add it here, or send it sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add it for you.
We previously reported that there were unconfirmed stories Mauro Cateni was an actual pipe maker who displayed his pipes at shows, but no one could verify having actually seen him, let alone having purchased a pipe from him. Thanks to information uncovered by Stefan Petzuch and Jens Olaf Stehr, we can now confirm that Mauro Cateni was simply branding, and not an actual pipe maker.


The origins and relative merits of Mauro Cateni pipes are difficult to nail down. This is not unusual in the pipe world, of course, but this brand having been named after a person, one would assume that person was either a pipe maker, or somehow affiliated with the company making the pipes. That does not appear to be the case with Mauro Cateni.
Stefan Petzuch recently bought a group of estate pipes, including a Mauro Cateni. While they were researching, Jens Olaf discovered the German trademark registry shows that "Mauro Cateni" was registered as a trademark for "pipes and other smoking articles, imported from and exported to Italian speaking areas" in 1979 by a then German tobacco wholesaler named Gebr. Heinemann KG in Hamburg. It was extended once in 1999 and discontinued at request of the brand owner in 2010.[https://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1016761/DE?lang=en]


'''''The following is hearsay and conjecture--please take it with a grain of salt:'''''
Pipephil references the known line names of Mauro Cateni pipes as: Brulio, Classica, Gialla, Nuova Rossa [http://www.pipephil.eu/logos/en/logo-m4.html].
 
According to some unconfirmed reports, "eyewitnesses" describe a shy person standing around European pipe shows and fairs at the end of the 1980's / early 1990's humbly offering his pipes. This person, so they claim, was a new Italian pipemaker named Mauro Cateni. However, no one involved in the Italian pipe scene has ever seen a Mauro Cateni pipe in Italy, let alone personally known or reports knowing of Mauro Cateni. This seems especially unusual if one considers the scene at the time: no internet, no pipe forums or newsgroup, and no eBbay... One would expect a new and aspiring Italian pipemaker would first try to sell his pipes locally. There are many pipe makers whose production is mainly limited to serving their own communities in Italy. It's possible this is the brand of of one of those pipe makers, but that seems a stretch. And so there are doubts about the actual existence of a pipemaker named Mauro Cateni.
The origins and relative merits of Mauro Cateni pipes have been difficult to nail down. This is not unusual in the pipe world, of course, but this brand having been named after a person, one would assume that person was either a pipe maker, or somehow affiliated with the company making the pipes. We can finally confirm that this is not the case with Mauro Cateni.


[[Image:MauroCateni_90.jpg|right|thumb]]
[[Image:MauroCateni_90.jpg|right|thumb]]
Perhaps a major pipe manufacturer adopted the name Mauro Cateni for a second brand, and then made an effort to market the pipes as the production of an "emerging Italian pipe maker"... The bulk of the these pipes were predominantly classical shapes that could have been easily produced with fraized stummels. In addition, many pieces were sandblasted. Very few Italian pipemakers working independently had blasting equipment at that time.


The following are two critiques on the relative merits of these pipes. As you will see, these pipes are enjoyed by one, and avoided by other.  
The following are three critiques on the relative merits of these pipes. As you will see, these pipes are enjoyed by one, avoided by another, while the third finds middle ground between the extremes.


'''Experience one:'''  
'''Experience one:'''  
Line 22: Line 21:
"I am not of the opinion of these comments. over a long period as a pipe collector at least 50 pipes of this brand went through my hands. Not a single one was "shameless putty filled". Most of these pipes with a good grain, sometimes very fine straight grain, stem mostly hand-cut. No exceptional pipes but worth to look for. Mostly not expensive. I can´t understand the comments written above." </blockquote>
"I am not of the opinion of these comments. over a long period as a pipe collector at least 50 pipes of this brand went through my hands. Not a single one was "shameless putty filled". Most of these pipes with a good grain, sometimes very fine straight grain, stem mostly hand-cut. No exceptional pipes but worth to look for. Mostly not expensive. I can´t understand the comments written above." </blockquote>


'''SYSOP's Note:''' Hopefully we can evoke some actual facts on this brand at some point, meanwhile I've tried to reconcile an early opinionated article (by TseHa), with a broader view. Many thanks to (UMVOKO) for sharing his positive experience with the brand. We would certainly not want to discourage anyone from taking a chance on buying a pipe they find attractive at an affordable price. Many a treasure has earned its place in rotation in spite of its origins, and these sorts of pipes can offer all the more enjoyment knowing you have beat the odds. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 08:37, 14 August 2019 (CDT)
'''Experience three''': ''by Stefan Petzuch (who has also clarified the mystery of the brand's origins)''
<blockquote>
About the pipe: I agree with both reviews in the article. The pipe I have is a fine piece, nice grain, handcut stem and properly built. But it has a huge putty spot on the bowl (see images). </blockquote>
 
<gallery widths=300 heights=200 caption="Example, courtesy Stefan Petzuch">
MauroCateni-SP.jpg|A nice shape with very good grain
MauroCateni-SP-2.jpg|Note the sizable fill in the front of the bowl
</gallery>
 
'''SYSOP's Note:''' Thanks to everyone who contributed to this article over the years. The evolution from general speculation to emerging facts shows the power of collaboration facilitated by the wiki concept. If you have any further information on this brand, or who made the pipes for Gebr. Heinemann KG, please add it here, or send it to sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add them for you.


[[Category: Pipe makers by nationality]][[Category: Italy]]
[[Category: Pipe makers by nationality]][[Category: Italy]][[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Need Information]]
[[Category:Need Information]]

Revision as of 12:19, 31 August 2020

We previously reported that there were unconfirmed stories Mauro Cateni was an actual pipe maker who displayed his pipes at shows, but no one could verify having actually seen him, let alone having purchased a pipe from him. Thanks to information uncovered by Stefan Petzuch and Jens Olaf Stehr, we can now confirm that Mauro Cateni was simply branding, and not an actual pipe maker.

Stefan Petzuch recently bought a group of estate pipes, including a Mauro Cateni. While they were researching, Jens Olaf discovered the German trademark registry shows that "Mauro Cateni" was registered as a trademark for "pipes and other smoking articles, imported from and exported to Italian speaking areas" in 1979 by a then German tobacco wholesaler named Gebr. Heinemann KG in Hamburg. It was extended once in 1999 and discontinued at request of the brand owner in 2010.[1]

Pipephil references the known line names of Mauro Cateni pipes as: Brulio, Classica, Gialla, Nuova Rossa [2].

The origins and relative merits of Mauro Cateni pipes have been difficult to nail down. This is not unusual in the pipe world, of course, but this brand having been named after a person, one would assume that person was either a pipe maker, or somehow affiliated with the company making the pipes. We can finally confirm that this is not the case with Mauro Cateni.

MauroCateni 90.jpg

The following are three critiques on the relative merits of these pipes. As you will see, these pipes are enjoyed by one, avoided by another, while the third finds middle ground between the extremes.

Experience one:

"Many Mauro Cateni pipes display quite shameless putty fillings. So it is hard to believe that someone might have thought he might carve himself a good reputation with such pipes. Even harder to believe that an acknowledged pipemaker would have taken the risk to ruin his reputation offering such putty monsters! (Even though these pipes received many friendly critics on their overall workmanship and smoking abilities.)

Generally speaking, the Italian pipe making scene offers such a wealth of good to very good to excellent pipes that there is really no need to spend money on a more or less obscure "Mauro Cateni"."

Experience two:

"I am not of the opinion of these comments. over a long period as a pipe collector at least 50 pipes of this brand went through my hands. Not a single one was "shameless putty filled". Most of these pipes with a good grain, sometimes very fine straight grain, stem mostly hand-cut. No exceptional pipes but worth to look for. Mostly not expensive. I can´t understand the comments written above."

Experience three: by Stefan Petzuch (who has also clarified the mystery of the brand's origins)

About the pipe: I agree with both reviews in the article. The pipe I have is a fine piece, nice grain, handcut stem and properly built. But it has a huge putty spot on the bowl (see images).

SYSOP's Note: Thanks to everyone who contributed to this article over the years. The evolution from general speculation to emerging facts shows the power of collaboration facilitated by the wiki concept. If you have any further information on this brand, or who made the pipes for Gebr. Heinemann KG, please add it here, or send it to sethile.pipes@gmail.com and we can add them for you.