Talk:Gloredo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Yes, thanks for your comment, and I understand. I'm not familiar with these pipes either before or after Chi Cheng's ownership. I don't see any reason not to include the history of the pipes, at least. I will edit the article to include the Gloredo history as best I can piece it together from what we had. Thanks again, and all the best. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 09:33, 11 December 2012 (CST) | : Yes, thanks for your comment, and I understand. I'm not familiar with these pipes either before or after Chi Cheng's ownership. I don't see any reason not to include the history of the pipes, at least. I will edit the article to include the Gloredo history as best I can piece it together from what we had. Thanks again, and all the best. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 09:33, 11 December 2012 (CST) | ||
:: Thanks for your answer. It should be clear that the TWO Gloredos brands co-exist. A way to mention it could be to give the TWO links to their respective websites. | |||
Revision as of 16:07, 11 December 2012
My opinion : The only Gloredo pipes we know are represented by the pipe displayed at "Pipes: Logos & Markings" (Gloredo)
For me it is since oct 2007 the true GLOREDO and will stay it.
- Yes, thanks for your comment, and I understand. I'm not familiar with these pipes either before or after Chi Cheng's ownership. I don't see any reason not to include the history of the pipes, at least. I will edit the article to include the Gloredo history as best I can piece it together from what we had. Thanks again, and all the best. --sethile 09:33, 11 December 2012 (CST)
- Thanks for your answer. It should be clear that the TWO Gloredos brands co-exist. A way to mention it could be to give the TWO links to their respective websites.