Talk:Pipe Tobacco: Difference between revisions

From Pipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


The number of readily available tobacco related resources is enormous. This is symptomatic that only resources of not clear credibility are mentioned.
The number of readily available tobacco related resources is enormous. This is symptomatic that only resources of not clear credibility are mentioned.
----
----
Great idea, Misha! Would like to improve it? The article is largely based on the ASP FAQ on tobaccos at this point, and I'm sure much of that is simply dated now. I do not have the expertise to do this without a great deal of effort, and could really use the help if you're interested. Thanks! Scott
Great idea, Misha! Would you like to improve it? The article is largely based on the ASP FAQ on tobaccos at this point, and I'm sure much of that is simply dated now. I do not have the expertise to do this without a great deal of effort, and could really use the help if you're interested. Thanks! Scott
----
OK, I edited the sections mentioned by Misha, but this article needs a lot of work. Hopefully we can get some help with some expertise here. If not, I'll limit it to a general overview with links to off site resources. Please consider helping out here! E-mail me if you need any help with the MediaWiki interface, or check the following link: [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Editing_pages Mediwiki help]. Thanks, Scott mailto:sethile.pipes@gmail.com

Revision as of 13:50, 8 August 2007

This article should be completely rewritten

The article has a lot of outdated (e.g. Vegas Smoke does not sell tobacco for at least a year, Nichols & Brown is also out of business if I am not mistaken), misleading (e.g. absense of additives (?) in non-aromatic blends, British laws and adulterants in tobaccos) and wrong (e.g. Percy Martin is the only grower of the "authentic" Perique).

The number of readily available tobacco related resources is enormous. This is symptomatic that only resources of not clear credibility are mentioned.


Great idea, Misha! Would you like to improve it? The article is largely based on the ASP FAQ on tobaccos at this point, and I'm sure much of that is simply dated now. I do not have the expertise to do this without a great deal of effort, and could really use the help if you're interested. Thanks! Scott


OK, I edited the sections mentioned by Misha, but this article needs a lot of work. Hopefully we can get some help with some expertise here. If not, I'll limit it to a general overview with links to off site resources. Please consider helping out here! E-mail me if you need any help with the MediaWiki interface, or check the following link: Mediwiki help. Thanks, Scott mailto:sethile.pipes@gmail.com