Dunhill Collections: Difference between revisions

From Pipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
File:Magnum 1926 .jpg|Shell MAGNUM (1) PAT. NO. 1341418/20 6 (1926)
File:Magnum 1926 .jpg|Shell MAGNUM (1) PAT. NO. 1341418/20 6 (1926)
File:Magnum 2 1926.jpg|Shell MAGNUM (2) PAT. N0. 1341418/20 6 (1926)
File:Magnum 2 1926.jpg|Shell MAGNUM (2) PAT. N0. 1341418/20 6 (1926)
File:1927 Magnum 1.png|MAGNUM MADE IN ENGLAND7 PAT.NO1343253/20 (1927)*
File:1927 Magnum 1.png|MAGNUM MADE IN ENGLAND7 PAT.NO 1343253/20 (1927)*
File:Shell.1928 9.png|9 PAT. Nos 119708/17 116989/17 8
File:Shell.1928 9.png|Shell 9 PAT. Nos 119708/17 116989/17 8
File:1928 128.jpg| 128 Shell from 1928
File:1928 128.jpg| 128 Shell from 1928
File:1928 AND 1929 (top) LO9'S 2.png|2 LO9’s 1928 and 1929 - PAT. NO 5861/17 8 and PAT. NO 11689/17 9
File:1928 AND 1929 (top) LO9'S 2.png|2 LO9’s 1928 and 1929 - PAT. NO 5861/17 8 and PAT. NO 11689/17 9

Revision as of 23:21, 21 May 2021


Dunhill Collection - Erik Hesse (US)
From the 20s
* Note: This pipe is extraordinarily large -- 11 inches in length and 4 ¾ inches in height. It is un-smoked and remains in its almost flawless original case. I assume this pipe was made to be a display piece for a Dunhill shop, although the patent number is for American export, which makes it impossible to speculate as to what shop that might have been.  The pipe includes the original inner tube that also has correct patent stamping.
From the 30s
From the 40s
From the 50s
From the 60s
From the 70s
From the 80s


Addendum:

P&T 1998
Edsel was in the first generation of serious (pre-Loring) Dunhill collectors.





Chip states, "I understand that Dunhill rarely makes a spigot in a size five. They're few and far between due to the limited production. At least that is what the Dunhill representative told me - maybe once a year. Who's knows, he might have been playing salesman.



Yang (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)