5,741
edits
User talk:Magna: Difference between revisions
→Dunhill Page
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
:::::::: Indeed, communication in English seems to be usually problematic. I don't know if for cultural or linguistic reasons. | :::::::: Indeed, communication in English seems to be usually problematic. I don't know if for cultural or linguistic reasons. | ||
:::::::: In my perception, you always consult someone before modifying what they did, for the sake of respect or cordiality. You should remember that I've always consulted you about changes. But that's not the problem... | :::::::: In my perception, you always consult someone before modifying what they did, for the sake of respect or cordiality. You should remember that I've always consulted you about changes, Scott. But that's not the problem... | ||
:::::::: The page is not mine and I don't want to suppress the freedom that a collaborative project should have. My question is about having the presumption of modifying someone's work and having the audacity and inelegance to say that there is a "smart way to be done" without having the slightest idea what caused the problem, treating others as ignorant. That's unnecessary and rude, and that I can't accept. | :::::::: The page is not mine and I don't want to suppress the freedom that a collaborative project should have. My question is about having the presumption of modifying someone's work and having the audacity and inelegance to say that there is a "smart way to be done" without having the slightest idea what caused the problem, treating others as ignorant. That's unnecessary and rude, and that I can't accept. | ||
:::::::: Magna, instead of erasing and modifying the work of others without any respect and presumptuously, perhaps you should devote your time to truly producing your own and totally "error-proof" content. Thank you. | :::::::: Magna, instead of erasing and modifying the work of others without any respect and presumptuously, perhaps you should devote your time to truly producing your own and totally "error-proof" content. Thank you. | ||