5,741
edits
User talk:Magna: Difference between revisions
→Dunhill Page
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:::::::: In my perception, you always consult someone before modifying what they did, for the sake of respect or cordiality. You should remember that I've always consulted you about changes, Scott. But that's not the problem... | :::::::: In my perception, you always consult someone before modifying what they did, for the sake of respect or cordiality. You should remember that I've always consulted you about changes, Scott. But that's not the problem... | ||
:::::::: The page is not mine and I don't want to suppress the freedom that a collaborative project should have. My question is about having the presumption of modifying someone's work and having the audacity and inelegance to say that there is a "smart way to be done" without having the slightest idea what caused the problem, treating others as ignorant. That's unnecessary and rude, and that I can't accept. | :::::::: The page is not mine and I don't want to suppress the freedom that a collaborative project should have. My question is about having the presumption of modifying someone's work and having the audacity and inelegance to say that there is a "smart way to be done" without having the slightest idea what caused the problem, treating others as ignorant. That's unnecessary and rude, and that I can't accept. | ||
:::::::: Magna, there are better ways for you to show your superiority... instead of erasing and modifying the work of others without any respect and presumptuously, perhaps you should devote your time to truly producing your own "smart" and totally "error-proof" content. Thank you. | :::::::: Magna, there are better ways for you to show your superiority... instead of erasing and modifying the work of others without any respect and presumptuously, perhaps you should devote your time to truly producing your own "smart" one and totally "error-proof" content. Thank you. | ||