Brigham Pipes – A Closer Look at Dots, Dates and Markings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
[[File:DadsPipesBanner.JPG|link=https://dadspipes.com/|thumb|500px|Many thanks to Charles Lemon of [https://dadspipes.com/ DadsPipes.com] for permission to re-publish this wonderful article.]]
[[File:DadsPipesBanner.JPG|link=https://dadspipes.com/|thumb|500px|Many thanks to Charles Lemon of [https://dadspipes.com/ DadsPipes.com] for permission to re-publish this wonderful article.]]
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
Last updated 8 Feb 2018
As both a Canadian and a pipe lover, it is perhaps inevitable that I hold a special place in my heart for Canadian-made pipes, especially those produced by Brigham Pipes, one of the country’s oldest pipe-makers, and one that has survived two World Wars, the Great Depression, countless lesser economic upheavals, and the more recent and radical cultural shift away from tobacco use.
As both a Canadian and a pipe lover, it is perhaps inevitable that I hold a special place in my heart for Canadian-made pipes, especially those produced by Brigham Pipes, one of the country’s oldest pipe-makers, and one that has survived two World Wars, the Great Depression, countless lesser economic upheavals, and the more recent and radical cultural shift away from tobacco use.


I have several dozen vintage Brigham pipes in my personal collection, and over time I have developed some fluency for identifying and dating the various examples of briarwork, both pedestrian and remarkable, with which I have been fortunate to become acquainted. My goal here is to present, as clearly as possible, a concise guide to decoding the stamps, markings and other features of Brigham pipes over seven distinct periods of production.
I have dozens of vintage Brigham pipes in my personal collection, and over time I have developed some fluency for identifying and dating the various examples of briarwork, both pedestrian and remarkable, with which I have been fortunate to become acquainted. My goal here is to present, as clearly as possible, a concise guide to decoding the stamps, markings and other features of Brigham pipes over seven distinct periods of production.


Data for this project has been gleaned from many sources, including, but not limited to, the “official” (if scant and sometimes confused) Brigham history published on the company’s website, other online resources such as pipe logo and markings site Pipephil.eu and forum posts by other Brigham enthusiasts, and, where available, vintage catalogs and firsthand examination. If there are flaws or faults in the information presented below, I assume all responsibility and would be thrilled to receive expert correction from confirmed and documented sources.
Data for this project has been gleaned from many sources, including, but not limited to, the “official” (if scant and sometimes confusing) Brigham history published on the company’s website, other online resources such as pipe logo and markings site [http://www.pipephil.eu/ Pipephil.eu], forum posts by other Brigham enthusiasts, and, where available, vintage catalogs and firsthand examination. If there are flaws or faults in the information presented below, I assume all responsibility and would be thrilled to receive expert correction from confirmed and documented sources.


EDIT: In April of 2017, I received an email from Daniel More, President of Brigham Enterprises Inc, with his input on this paper, which I have incorporated into the information presented below.
'''EDIT:''' In April of 2017, I received an email from Daniel More, President of Brigham Enterprises Inc, with his input on this paper, which I have incorporated into the information presented below. '''Pipedia Editors note''': And these edits were subsequently added to the Pipedia article --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 15:52, 12 April 2017 (CDT)


=== Brigham Production Eras ===
=== Brigham Production Eras ===
Line 85: Line 87:


=== Other Pinning Patterns to 1980 ===
=== Other Pinning Patterns to 1980 ===
In the late 1960’s and 1970’s, Brigham was working on revising its grading system to simplify pin configurations and reduce consumer confusion around the multiple 3-Dot configurations. During this transitional time, the product line was reduced, dropping several of the original grades.


In the late 1960s and 1970s, the Brigham Norsemen and Valhalla series of larger, Scandinavian-inspired pipe shapes carried their own configuration of Dots. These two series shared the same 6 shapes.
The progression, found below in the 1975 Brigham catalog, shows 1 through 4-Dot grades, followed by Special Grain (stamped with the old VIP Horizontal 3-Dot pins) and Select Grain (pinned as a 5-Dot).


The Norsemen were fully rusticated and pinned with the old Brigham VIP 3 Dot horizontally aligned pattern, with the middle Dot larger than the other two. They were stamped with “9Wx”, where “x” indicated the shape number (3 through 7).
[[File:Brigham-dots-1975.jpg]]


The Valhalla series of smooth or partially rusticated pipes were available in three grades, A, B and C, with C being the highest grade. A Valhalla pipe in Shape 6 could therefore be stamped “AW6”, “BW6” or “CW6” depending on grade. Dot patterns on the stem ranged from 3 dots (A grade) to 6 Dots (C grade).
=== Norseman and Valhalla Series ===
 
[[File:2nvdxxi.jpg|thumb|right]] the late 1960s and 1970s, the Brigham Norsemen and Valhalla series of larger, Scandinavian-inspired pipe shapes carried their own configuration of Dots. These two series shared the same 6 shapes.
 
The Norsemen were fully rusticated and pinned with the old Brigham VIP 3 Dot horizontally aligned pattern, with the middle Dot larger than the other two. They were stamped with “9Wx”, where “x” indicated the shape number (2 through 7).
 
The Valhalla series of smooth or partially rusticated pipes were available in three grades, A, B and C, with C being the highest grade. A Valhalla pipe in Shape 6 could therefore be stamped “AV6”, “BV6” or “CV6” depending on grade. Dot patterns on the stem ranged from 4 dots (A grade) to 6 Dots (C grade).


[[File:BrighamArticle OtherPinningPatterns(to1980).jpg]]
[[File:BrighamArticle OtherPinningPatterns(to1980).jpg]]
Line 109: Line 118:
''"Until the mid-70’s Brigham would, from time to time, manufacture non-filtered pipes. That said, this was infrequent and in limited quantities. Principally the motive was to use small bowls with thin shanks that could not accommodate the Brigham System.” – Daniel More, President, Brigham Enterprises''
''"Until the mid-70’s Brigham would, from time to time, manufacture non-filtered pipes. That said, this was infrequent and in limited quantities. Principally the motive was to use small bowls with thin shanks that could not accommodate the Brigham System.” – Daniel More, President, Brigham Enterprises''


The latest pipes to be offered without a filter belonged to Brigham’s Platinum Series, introduced in the 1990’s:
[[File:Platinum-series-354-bent-apple.jpg|thumb|left|Platinum Series 354]]The latest pipes to be offered without a filter belonged to Brigham’s Platinum Series, introduced in the 1990’s:


'''“This initiative was in response to our expanding sales into the USA. Being met with resistance against filtered pipes in the USA (even though the Brigham System is not, in fact, a filter) we countered this opposition with non-filtered pipes. Interesting to note that when offered the option, the Brigham System was favoured.” – Daniel More, President, Brigham Enterprises''
'''“This initiative was in response to our expanding sales into the USA. Being met with resistance against filtered pipes in the USA (even though the Brigham System is not, in fact, a filter) we countered this opposition with non-filtered pipes. Interesting to note that when offered the option, the Brigham System was favoured.” – Daniel More, President, Brigham Enterprises''
Line 116: Line 125:
=== Modern Brigham Pipes ===
=== Modern Brigham Pipes ===


Except for the lowest three grades, pipes in the current (2007) Brigham series cannot be identified by brass pins or shape availability. All grades are available in 12 shapes, but are distinguished by their unique finishes and markings.
Except for the lowest three grades, pipes in the current (2007) Brigham series cannot be identified by brass pins or shape availability. All grades are available in 12 standard shapes, but are distinguished by their unique finishes and markings. As noted above, the Voyageur, Algonquin and Mountaineer pipes are made in Italy, while the remaining pipes in this series (Chinook, Heritage, Klondike and Acadian) are produced in France.


[[File:BrighamArticle 2007BrighamSeries.jpg]]
[[File:BrighamArticle 2007BrighamSeries.jpg]]
[[File:Brigham-4-7 Silhouettes.jpg|thumb|center|2007 Series Shapes]]
[[File:BrighamPresidentBoardroom.jpg|thumb|150px|Brigham President “Boardroom”]]Brigham President Series pipes are still available, though the brass pins are gone, replaced with the now ubiquitous Brigham “B” logo in a circle, set into the top of the acrylic stem. The modern series is based on Scandinavian shapes that Herb Brigham enjoyed the most,  in a variety of finishes named after “executive places” – locations you’d expect to find a CEO or company executive, including “Boardroom”, “Muskoka”, “The Country Club”, and “The Helm”.
[[File:Brigham Giant.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Brigham Giante Semi-Bent Sandblast]]Not content to rest on their laurels, Brigham has recently introduced a new range of pipes, the Giante Series. As the name implies, these pipes are larger, designed to provide a longer smoke from a single bowl. They are available in three traditional shapes (Bent (Egg), Semi-Bent (Brandy) and Straight (Billiard)) and in either a reddish-brown smooth or black sandblast finish. All of them come with the Brigham Rock Maple filter system.


== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==


I hope this little treatise on Brigham pipes proves a useful resource for the identification and dating of pipes in your collection, or perhaps those you might wish to consider for a vacant space in your pipe rack. As you can see by the variations in stamps even within the same general period, it can be tricky to nail down the exact production time-frame for a given pipe.
As you can see by the variations in stamps even within the same general period, it can be tricky to nail down the exact production time-frame for a given pipe.
 
'''Daniel More, President of Brigham Enterprises Inc, acknowledges the difficulties facing the Brigham collector:'''
 
''“You have correctly identified the challenge in pinpointing exactly when we used and stopped using certain stamps and pin configurations. I wouldn’t suggest this was the result of a lack of care or concern but rather the result of a production era approach. In hindsight, it makes perfect sense to keep track of when stamps were initiated and ceased use. It would save some of what I refer to as the antique Brigham road show. Haha.”''
 
Worn or imperfectly struck stamps confuse the game, as can such factory-floor practices as using up old stock during transition periods (For example, I have a Brigham President A Grade freehand sent out with a Valhalla B grade (4 Dot) stem.). Unfortunately, there are very few pipe producers that created and maintained a foolproof method of dating their wares.  (Dunhill is the obvious exception here, and their use of a date stamp on every pipe produced accounts at least in part for the collectible nature of vintage Dunhill pipes today.)
 
Vintage pipe catalogs and other company literature can be of great value in establishing a production timeline for a particular pipe, though this is not always foolproof. I own several old Brigham catalogs, but none of them are dated – another unfortunate custom of the day shared by many makers until the late 1970s.


Worn or imperfectly struck stamps confuse the game, as can such factory-floor practices as using up old stock during transition periods (For example, I have a Brigham President A Grade freehand sent out with a Valhalla B grade (4 Dot) stem.). Carefully archived notes and company catalogs are often the most foolproof method of dating your Brigham, but you’ll have to find some on the vintage market, as Brigham has proved itself more interested in making pipes than preserving records. I own several old Brigham catalogs, but none of them are dated – another unfortunate custom of the day shared by many makers until the late 1970s.
Incomplete information and undated literature are part and parcel of the pipe collecting hobby, and though it can be frustrating at times, the thrill of discovering a new pipe shape or finish variation more than makes up for any initial inconvenience in identifying that new acquisition. I hope this little treatise on Brigham pipes proves a useful resource for the identification and dating of pipes in your collection, or perhaps those you might wish to consider for a vacant space in your pipe rack.


I’ll now open the floor to you for comments or corrections. I would especially welcome any high-resolution digital copies of Brigham literature that would help verify or expand information in this paper.
I’ll now open the floor to you for comments or corrections. I would especially welcome any high-resolution digital copies of Brigham literature that would help verify or expand information in this paper.


Thanks for joining me on this little 110 year trip. Until next time, Happy Piping!
Thanks for joining me on this little 110 year trip. Until next time, Happy Piping!
== Sources: ==
#http://www.brighampipes.com
#http://www.christianpipesmokers.net/viewtopic.php?t=7476
#http://www.rebornpipes.com/tag/brigham-pipes/
#http://www.pipephil.eu
#Email from Daniel More, President, Brigham Entreprises Inc, April 2017
#Email from Brian Levine, former National Sales Manager, Brigham USA, February 2017


== Sources: ==
== Sources: ==

Navigation menu