Talk:Pipe Tobacco: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 178.73.219.166 (talk) to last revision by Thundersnow)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


This thing needs a bit of scouring just to make it palatable to educated folk! C'mon, this is just lazy. I say "c'mon" because this is the talk page. The entry itself ought to be perfectly written, not sounding like a letter to a dopey pal in Wisconsin![[User:Thundersnow|Thundersnow]] 00:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
This thing needs a bit of scouring just to make it palatable to educated folk! C'mon, this is just lazy. I say "c'mon" because this is the talk page. The entry itself ought to be perfectly written, not sounding like a letter to a dopey pal in Wisconsin![[User:Thundersnow|Thundersnow]] 00:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
== jsut passing by ==
I just added your blog site to my blogroll, I pray you would give some thought to doing the same.
:Is it pipes and/or tobacco related? If so, please feel free to link it in the Pipedia Links section in the appropriate subsection --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 20:18, 25 April 2011 (CDT)

Navigation menu