30
edits
Talk:Stanwell: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Stizzleswick (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:I agree on all this. But let's not loose this information and format until we have a decent article. Instead I'd suggest we simply move it, and link to it from the more typical open source article. You will find many articles here on Pipedia are like this. It was a good way to start the project. We also have permission to use the Smoking pipes images in a collaborative article as long as we credit them, so that's not a problem. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 20:13, 31 January 2009 (CST) | :I agree on all this. But let's not loose this information and format until we have a decent article. Instead I'd suggest we simply move it, and link to it from the more typical open source article. You will find many articles here on Pipedia are like this. It was a good way to start the project. We also have permission to use the Smoking pipes images in a collaborative article as long as we credit them, so that's not a problem. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 20:13, 31 January 2009 (CST) | ||
::I agree; the article as it stands is pure marketing materials. Will take some doing to re-write; I have a little info not included here which I could contribute. If I had to do a complete re-write, that would take some time, really. Mind you, I believe the smokingpipes.com article should be linked to by all means. Just maybe not used as the meat and bones of this article. Also, structuring is weak, with the entire thing in one block--I'll put in a headline or two for the time being. --[[User:Stizzleswick|Stizzleswick]] ([[User talk:Stizzleswick|talk]]) 02:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC) | |||