User talk:Pipephil: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 23: Line 23:


:Thanks for all your help Pipephil! As Frank suggested I've added the Marks/Logos link to the sidebar navigation. I like Frank's idea of adding a Pipedia Page for any pipe brand/name you want to link to, then place a link from that page to Pipephil. That will also provide a ready place on Pipedia for additional information. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 14:02, 26 March 2009 (CDT)
:Thanks for all your help Pipephil! As Frank suggested I've added the Marks/Logos link to the sidebar navigation. I like Frank's idea of adding a Pipedia Page for any pipe brand/name you want to link to, then place a link from that page to Pipephil. That will also provide a ready place on Pipedia for additional information. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 14:02, 26 March 2009 (CDT)
:The advantage of the Marks/Logo page, assuming it were to get flushed out eventually, is for situations where someone is trying to identify a pipe with some sort of logo without knowing the maker. Regardless, I think relevant off site links should be added at the bottom of each article directly. --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 15:42, 26 March 2009 (CDT)