User talk:Sethile: Difference between revisions

Line 26: Line 26:


Hey Frank, step back a bit, will ya? What, does every email that sounds like a name necessarily imply that is the name? It appears it was a careless and stupid thing to try and call anyone by any name in that way. And men of the cloth are HUMAN--like you. Rude and belligerent. Don't have to be a man of God to be forgiving and a little kind, eh?
Hey Frank, step back a bit, will ya? What, does every email that sounds like a name necessarily imply that is the name? It appears it was a careless and stupid thing to try and call anyone by any name in that way. And men of the cloth are HUMAN--like you. Rude and belligerent. Don't have to be a man of God to be forgiving and a little kind, eh?
Hey Frank, I jumped back in here because I've got a 'better one' for you:
Don't you think it was more than a little stupid as well as presumptuous for this Scott to attempt to use a first name basis situation? With someone who wanted to be known by username?
Do you think this person would have liked his email, genuine name or not, to be even partially displayed publicly? (I noticed Eric Blair...that was English writer George Orwell's real name.) Does this place do that, publicly show an email? I know I'm not going to join now.
Don't you think maybe an admonition as well as an apology would have served better? From what I see, isn't this a matter of you getting pissed because this Scott stepped out of line and then got called out of line for it?
One thing I can see: this place is going to turn quickly into a stink-swamp like Wikipedia. That place is worse than Viet Nam was.
Anonymous user