User talk:Sethile: Difference between revisions

Line 86: Line 86:


: Yes, I agree, and I responded in the Gloredo's talk as well. Regardless of the current status of the brand there is no reason not to include its history, which is way it is relevant...  --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 09:38, 11 December 2012 (CST)
: Yes, I agree, and I responded in the Gloredo's talk as well. Regardless of the current status of the brand there is no reason not to include its history, which is way it is relevant...  --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 09:38, 11 December 2012 (CST)
:: But there are TWO gloredos apparently. I think this should be clear in the article, no ?
55

edits