Talk:Hardcastle: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
Joe
Joe


::Hello Joe and others, I just saw the comments above. Sorry I did not reply sooner. I agree that it would be beneficial to have information  better cited, much better! Some articles are cited, while others, why too many, are not. Sometimes by looking at the View History tab and comparing the different versions you can at least see what users have contributed the information. Sometimes the only record is the IP address of the computer the information was contributed from. Pipedia is still a work in progress, to be sure. This article in particular seems to generate a fair amount of questions. Here is an E-mail I received today from Andrew Serafin, for instance, which I will post here in case anyone can help with his questions :
::Hello Joe and others, I just saw the comments above. Sorry I did not reply sooner. I agree that it would be beneficial to have information  better cited, much better! Some articles are cited, while others, way too many, are not. Sometimes by looking at the View History tab and comparing the different versions you can at least see what users have contributed the information. Sometimes the only record is the IP address of the computer the information was contributed from. Pipedia is still a work in progress, to be sure. This article in particular seems to generate a fair amount of questions. Here is an E-mail I received today from Andrew Serafin, for instance, which I will post here in case anyone can help with his questions :


:::You introduced the products names of Hardcastele and its’ grouping: Pre-Cadogan Era and Seconds.Question #1: Could I know what is your source of info to follow my quest to know best? Question #2: Why you use the Pre-Cadogan as point of division? Neither Dunhill nor Hardcastele were in the Codogan group until I know. The story of Codogan group (until I know) is:
:::You introduced the products names of Hardcastele and its’ grouping: Pre-Cadogan Era and Seconds.Question #1: Could I know what is your source of info to follow my quest to know best? Question #2: Why you use the Pre-Cadogan as point of division? Neither Dunhill nor Hardcastele were in the Codogan group until I know. The story of Codogan group (until I know) is:
Line 33: Line 33:


::If anyone with some expertise that would care to answer these questions and/or contribute to the article with better information and it would be most appreciated! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 21:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
::If anyone with some expertise that would care to answer these questions and/or contribute to the article with better information and it would be most appreciated! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 21:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
== Cleaned up the article as best I could ==
I cleaned up the main article as best I could. If those of you with more expertise would take a look and let me know if anything needs further clarification I would greatly appreciate it! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 17:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Navigation menu