23,094
edits
Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by Armitadev (talk) to last revision by Stithosd
MarkThompson (talk | contribs) (minor updates) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
If you need any help contributing, please let me know. I'll be happy to help you get started. E-mail me at mailto:sethile.pipes@gmail.com | If you need any help contributing, please let me know. I'll be happy to help you get started. E-mail me at mailto:sethile.pipes@gmail.com | ||
S | |||
== More Contributors Needed == | == More Contributors Needed == | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
* '''S''' | * '''S''' | ||
* STOA Briars (Todd M. Johnson) | * STOA Briars (Todd M. Johnson) | ||
There's another problem: "John Aylesbury" (DE), "Mauro Cateni" (IT), "Peter Rasmussen" (DK) and others more are not real persons but fictional names. In these cases I'd lean forward to sort "Mauro Cateni" (e.g.) under M. -- Now, as far as I can see, we haven't applied a standard consequently yet. That's making it difficult. For sure, doing it from now on would make it necassary to re-name numerous pages and alter x internal links. I'm | There's another problem: "John Aylesbury" (DE), "Mauro Cateni" (IT), "Peter Rasmussen" (DK) and others more are not real persons but fictional names. In these cases I'd lean forward to sort "Mauro Cateni" (e.g.) under M. -- Now, as far as I can see, we haven't applied a standard consequently yet. That's making it difficult. For sure, doing it from now on would make it necassary to re-name numerous pages and alter x internal links. I'm aware of that, but have no clue at the moment. [[User:TseHa|TseHa]] | ||
:Bill, wow, the categories look extremely promising, thanks! TseHa, good points! I have long thought we should have some sort of pipe maker article naming convention that can accommodate the main variables. Most of the articles are Firstname Lastname. Perhaps we could also include other names that pipe maker is working under using redirects to the main article, with those also categorized so they appear in the category lists. Would that work? I don't know what listing possibilities there are within the categories, but perhaps Bill can come up with the best solution for us. I am very glad to have all the help for you both, and just sorry I was not better organized from the start. Now we have a little work to clean up once we get this on the right track! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 16:19, 30 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
:: I like the idea of redirects rather than re-naming the original articles; it seems tedious. I was planning on trying to categorize another 2 or 3 countries today (only in pipe-making - we can discuss other categories when I'm done) but considering our current discussion, should I hold off? [[User:Bmackenty|Bmackenty]] 08:29, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
::: Bill, I think you should feel free to go ahead with the category project. I can't think of a better way to organize this. We may have some work to do with redirects etc.., but unless I'm missing something I can't see that would effect the categories. Thanks so much for your help! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 16:26, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
A section for PIPE CLUBS would be nice | |||
: Good point! The link section certainly needs more structure... | |||
:: Great Idea! I agree, perhaps even starting a different article for clubs. I would also like to start a separate article for tobacconists which specialize in pipes and pipe tobacco. My thinking is that both of these could and should be organized by location using categories. Dive in if you like, or I'll try to start something like this when I'm back from my trip (currently fly fishing in Stanley ID, and found a coffee shop with wireless--not bad for a town with a year round population of under 100 brave souls!). --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 15:09, 11 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
I love the old pictures and art work about pipes. Also, famous or not so famous pipe smokers photos. I would like to see a gallery. | |||
:You can see a gallery of images here [[Special:Newimages]], otherwise they are simply embedded in the articles. Images could also be categorized and eventually listed that way. What do you mean exactly? If you have an idea for how this would work, please feel free to give it a try. Thanks! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 06:41, 10 December 2008 (CST) | |||
== спасибо за сайт (Thanks for The Site) == | |||
Thank you REALLY! Where have you been the last five years of my life? You only appeared on Google for me today! [[User:Webpoppy8]] 2012-06-11 | |||
Здравствуйте! Сайт приятный, хорошо оформлен. С удовольствием буду посещать! | |||
:''Rough Translation'': Hello! The site pleasant, is well issued. With pleasure I will visit! --[[User:Frank|Frank]] 4/17/09 | |||
Привет!!! Вот случайненько забрёл на ваш сайт и к своему удивлению обнаружил что здесь просто куча полезной информации, обязательно забегу сюда ещё раз, так как сейчас нет времени. 100% буду советовать вас своим друзьям! Счастливо!! | |||
:''Rough Translation'': Greetings!!! Here случайненько has come on your site and to the surprise has found out that here simply heap of the helpful information, I will necessarily run here once again as now there is no time. 100 % I will advise you to the friends! Happily!!--[[User:Frank|Frank]] 4/17/09 | |||
::Thanks, Frank--I'm very glad to have the translation! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 12:32, 18 April 2009 (CDT) | |||
::: Actually, I think the above is just spam. It's not pipe related. I just deleted an identical post to the last one translated. I guess we can leave these here for a bit though... --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] 10:12, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | |||
::::OK, Scott. If it's duplicated again, we remove it all and block the IP. --[[User:Frank|Frank]] 4/17/09 | |||