Talk:Hardcastle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Druconomy, biliography, and Cadogan: new section
No edit summary |
(→Druconomy, biliography, and Cadogan: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article has no indication of who authored it, so not sure who to address, but if this discussion page triggers an email to the author, I'd appreciate a come back. I am interested in dating (decade would be good enough) a Hardcastle 'CAMDEN'#45 (stem is probably not original), which is listed in this article as a 'pre-cadogan' model. Nowhere do I see a reference to cadogan in this article or the Dunhill article on this site. Who or what is cadogan and approximately what time frame does 'pre-cadogan' cover? Thanks! | This article has no indication of who authored it, so not sure who to address, but if this discussion page triggers an email to the author, I'd appreciate a come back. I am interested in dating (decade would be good enough) a Hardcastle 'CAMDEN'#45 (stem is probably not original), which is listed in this article as a 'pre-cadogan' model. Nowhere do I see a reference to cadogan in this article or the Dunhill article on this site. Who or what is cadogan and approximately what time frame does 'pre-cadogan' cover? Thanks! | ||
== Druconomy, biliography, and Cadogan == | |||
Hello, | |||
Hopfully there is someone who monitors this page. I have the following comments: | |||
1) I think it is Dryconomy, not the Druconomy as listed in the Pre-Gadogan line only because I have seen a pipe marked "HARDCASTLE BRITISH MADE DRYCONOMY 66". | |||
2) It sure would be nice if authors sited where they get their info like a regular wiki. I'd rather not repeat things that aren't true. | |||
3) I wish that whoever wrote this would add a bit more about Cadogan or create a Cadogan page and link it in this article. | |||
Thanks and good luck! | |||
Joe | |||