23,094
edits
User talk:Sethile: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
cc | cc | ||
--[[User:Flatticus|Flatticus]] ([[User talk:Flatticus|talk]]) 20:00, 8 June 2015 (CDT) | --[[User:Flatticus|Flatticus]] ([[User talk:Flatticus|talk]]) 20:00, 8 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
::Interesting. I was not aware of that and just checked. They were showing up fine for me. And they showed up on my phone and tablet too. Had my wife check on her computer and they did not show! Turns out she uses an add blocker. When she switched it off, presto, there they were! Interesting in that it was only catching the Missouri Meerschaum ones and not ones for the other underwriters in terms of stuff in content, but all of them were blocked in the top and bottom positions that are part of the skin... So, my big question is, do you have add blocking enabled on your browser? Bet so... | |||
::Pretty sure the reason the add blocker was catching the Missouri Meerschaum banners in content like that and not other underwriters was that the MM banners had "AD" in the file name, and the others did not. I changed the file names, but my wife's add blocker still caught them. I suspect the images themselves are now recognized by the add blocker independent of the file name. | |||
::Thanks for the heads up on this, Chris! Very interesting! --[[User:Sethile|sethile]] ([[User talk:Sethile|talk]]) 22:10, 8 June 2015 (CDT) | |||